stupidity

Credit card photo scam

1 Comment

Internet scams that target photographers have been around for years. Over the past couple of years, there’s another scam involving credit cards.

Posing as a customer, a scammer will ask to hire a photographer for an upcoming event but only if the photographer accepts credit cards. If the photographer agrees to the work, the “customer” will then mention that they also need to pay another event supplier who doesn’t take credit cards.

The scammer will offer to send extra money to the photographer which the photographer can use to pay that other supplier. To tempt the photographer, the scammer will promise the photographer a couple hundred dollars extra for their trouble.

The scammer will use a stolen credit card to pay the photographer’s fee, the other supplier’s fee and the extra money for the photographer’s trouble. The unsuspecting photographer will be told to pay the other supplier immediately – it’s urgent! – but only in cash through Western Union.
Continue reading →

The (F)utility of Low Prices

1 Comment

Photographers, how much would you charge to deliver 24 business headshots, 12 full-length environmental portraits and 4 environmental group shots?

Well, a Toronto photographer quoted $800 for this recent corporate job. This works out to $20 per delivered picture. The corporate client turned down this quote because even they knew the low price was ridiculous.

Photographers who try to discount or lowball their way into a job only hurt themselves. It’s been shown that customers are not fooled by bottom-end prices. So why do some photographers keep doing it?
Continue reading →

Cut out the middleman

2 Comments

If you’re a photographer who shoots corporate events like conferences and conventions, you may have noticed there are some online businesses that offer to connect you with customers. How nice of them.

Right now, one such European company is sending emails to photographers in Toronto, and apparently also in many other cities around the world, claiming that it has a customer with an urgent need for photo services in the photographer’s area.

If you ignore this email because of its generic nature or because it looks like spam, you’ll get more similar emails in the following weeks and months. The emails have a fake “unsubscribe” link that does nothing.

All these emails claim that this company has yet another customer with an immediate need for photography in your area. Of course, there is no customer. The oddly worded emails are often the same with maybe the name or date of the unidentified event changed.
Continue reading →

Yet another Toronto photo rights grab

No Comments

The City of Toronto is desperate for free pictures. The city is running yet another photo-rights grab disguised as a photo contest.

The city is asking people to send in winter pictures taken in city parks, ravines and recreation centres. The latter case, taking pictures inside recreation centres, violates the city’s own code of conduct for recreation centres.

In public parks, the city’s parks people are known for harassing photographers who have “big cameras” but no photo permit. Toronto even says that news photographers need prior city permission before shooting in a public park. Yet now, Toronto has a contest asking people to do what the city tries to ban.

Just like all previous Toronto photo contests, the rules say that Toronto gets:
Continue reading →

Another Toronto photo contest to avoid

No Comments

A year ago, the City of Toronto ran a photo-rights-grabbing effort disguised as a photo contest. The city is now running another photo contest. Let’s take a look.

The good news is that this contest has a big statement about copyright. It says the photographer will “retain full rights and ownership of their photos.” If any use is required beyond the contest, the city will negotiate with the photographer. Perfect.

And now the bad news. The rules state that every picture submitted to the contest becomes public record. Public record => almost public domain => photographer loses some rights and ownership of their photos.

The prizes are very minimal. Who wants to win lunch with Toronto’s General Manager of Transportation Services? Who wants a City of Toronto certificate? Prizes also include a magazine subscription (a $22 value), a gift certificate that can be used to buy a magazine subscription and a t-shirt, and your name on a vanity street sign.

Certainly this contest is aimed at amateurs. But why take advantage of them like this?

Why not have prizes like: no property taxes for a year, no utility bills for a year, one-year TTC transit passes, a year’s free parking at any city-owned parking lot.

 

Another cheap stock picture fail

No Comments

A Canadian federal election will happen in about six weeks. In its campaigning, the Conservative Party apparently likes to use cheap stock pictures in its marketing.

On at least four occasions, those stock pictures, and stock video, had nothing to do with Canada or with what the political party was trying to promote. All the photos were shot in other countries.

No one at the Conservative Party probably gave any thought to using cheap stock pictures other than “they’re cheap!” The pictures have now backfired and the party has become an even bigger punchline.

The wealthy Conservative Party could’ve hired Canadian photographers to shoot timely pictures of real Canadian subjects in Canada. The party could’ve stood behind its words by supporting Canadian small business. It could have led by example. But the Conservatives decided it wasn’t worth it.

Sadly, this is not the first time a political party has done this.

Every business should know this by now: cheap stock pictures don’t work, they do not create a unique message, they’re boring to look at. Oh wait. Maybe that is the message of the Conservative Party.

When you cut corners by using cheap stock photos, you fool no one but yourselves. Stock pictures are worthless when you’re trying to build credibility and trust.

 

Choosing cheap photography

No Comments

Two examples of bad photography decisions:

• The City of Toronto’s web site has a page promoting its new Pan Am BMX course that was used in the recent 2015 Pan Am Games. The photo shows a number of female competitors lined up at the starting gate.

The problems with the photo are that the event shown is not from the Pan Am Games, the track is not the city’s new BMX course and the location isn’t even in Toronto. Oops.

Some sports web sites in South America assumed this really was a Pan Am photo and used it in their news articles about the Pan Am BMX event. To be fair, those South American web sites were probably confused since the Toronto Pan Am Games itself initially used the same handout(?) picture on its BMX pages. Oops.
Continue reading →

css.php