rant

Observations from Photo Retouching

Lately, I’ve been doing a lot of photo retouching, working with images shot by other photographers. Some of these photographers clearly know their craft because the images sent to me are extremely well done. The retouching required is usually adding or removing specific objects as requested by the final client.

On the other hand, some photographers are, uh, not as skilled. A significant portion of my retouching work involves fixing their mistakes and trying to compensate for their lack of expertise. But even after retouching, the final image may still be subpar due to issues like weak portrait poses, poor lighting, bad composition, or other problems that retouching can’t fix.

Retouching Family Portraits

Recently I worked on two sets of family portraits, both shot outdoors, by different photographers.

The first set had images that were overexposed by about two stops, resulting in overly bright faces and washed-out hair. Additionally, all the photos were crooked. I guess the photographer had one leg shorter than the other :-) The images were also cropped too tightly, making it impossible to print or frame them without cutting off body parts of family members.

This photographer is a wedding-portrait photographer with ten years experience according to his website. A look at the EXIF data revealed he used Lightroom: his editing and masking were poorly executed, leaving behind clearly visible halos and artifacts.

The second set of family photos had some images that were too dark, others too bright, and one photo had its contrast lowered so much that it was a mostly grey image with no clear blacks or whites. The EXIF data showed that Lightroom was used and the photographer’s masking techniques left obvious outlines around the subjects when they did a terrible job of blurring the backgrounds.

These two sets of photos were, at best, the work of an advanced amateur, not a professional. If the photographers had delivered higher-quality images, there would have been little to no need for my retouching services, and the families would have saved money.

Photographers – learn to use your camera’s manual settings for portrait sessions. Use a tripod. Learn to edit. Get your photos critiqued at portfolio reviews.

Customers – always hire the best photographer you can afford. Don’t go cheap if the photos are important.

No Retouching Allowed!

I recently encountered an unusual situation when a customer requested retouching on some of her wedding photos. But her photographer had included a “no alterations” clause in the photo contract, prohibiting any edits or retouching by anyone other than the photographer. If the customer wanted any retouching done, they had to buy the service from the photographer.

A quick web search showed that a few other wedding photographers also have a no-alterations clause. I did not find any other type of photographer who had a similar contract clause, only wedding photographers. However I did find one wedding photographer whose contract specifically stated that the customer is free to use/edit/print their photos in any way they want, except for commercial use, and to enjoy and share their photos as much as possible. (This is a good marketing move.)

While I understand that photographers have moral rights over their work and that poorly executed retouching can reflect badly on the photographer, this type of restriction seems overly restrictive.

It’s quite possible this clause violates Canada’s Competition Act, Section 77, which addresses “exclusive dealing.” This law prevents a supplier or manufacturer from forcing customers to work only with them. Canada’s copyright law also allows customers to make alterations to photos for private use, meaning they are free to edit their images as they see fit.

The photos that the customer sent me for retouching had clear technical issues—exposure, colour, contrast, and saturation problems—that the photographer should have fixed before delivering the final images. Additionally, many of the photos needed retouching, such as smoothing the bride’s skin tone, removing stray hairs, adjusting a crooked tie, and cleaning up distracting backgrounds. I did all the retouching requested and the customer was happy with the results.

 

Retouching and Wedding Photos

If your wedding photos will be important to you, hiring a professional photographer is essential.

Recently I received an email from a woman who wanted to retouch her wedding photos from this past summer. She hoped to create a wedding album in time for Christmas. She wrote that the pictures “need work and maybe a lot of work.”

After reviewing her wedding photos, it was obvious she was right. Her photos needed a lot of work.

Instead of hiring a professional, the couple had asked friends with cellphones to take the wedding photos. While that might have seemed like a fun and budget-friendly decision at the time, reality has now set in.
Continue reading →

Artificially Intelligent Mayor

A photo from the published campaign platform of Toronto mayoral candidate Anthony Furey. Uhhhh, do you notice anything wrong? If you do then maybe you should run for mayor. I see at least six things wrong, ten if you want to get picky (see the comment section below).

But maybe nothing is wrong with the photo. Maybe Furey is saying that having a third arm will make you more prosperous. Vote for him and get another arm!

Note: The link to the original version of the campaign platform no longer works because it has been updated. Care to guess why it was updated?

Continue reading →

A Good Example Of Bad Public Relations

A 1950s public relations photo to publicize Dairy Queen’s banana drink in Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts. This Main Street ice cream shop still exists today but it’s no longer a Dairy Queen franchise. (US Library of Congress)

Public relations photography is, or at least should be, much more advanced today.

Today I received an unwanted press release from a Toronto public relations company. It was a good example of what not to do especially if you’re claiming to be a professional communications company.
Continue reading →

Window or Mirror?

Some selfies can work out very well. This woman got a good experience being close up with actor Ryan Reynolds, a nice photo of the two of them together and, because of the first two, she undoubtedly has a good memory of the event. But many selfies turn out to be duds.

The purpose of a selfie with a celebrity is the brief(?) illusion that you and the celebrity are connected. You can bask in the reflected glory of the celebrity and the selfie is a trophy you can show others.
Continue reading →

Happiness And Photography

People record a live event with their cellphones in Toronto, 2018. Instead of watching a real person right in front of them, many of these folks watched a one-and-a-half-inch digital version on their cellphone screen.

Back in the 1980s and 1990s, I occasionally crossed paths with a certain other newspaper photographer when I photographed dress rehearsals for ballet and opera. After shooting a suitable number of pictures of a rehearsal, I would leave the theatre. But this other photographer always stayed behind. He put his cameras on the floor and watched the remaining rehearsal. I thought he was being lazy, just sitting there and not taking pictures.
Continue reading →

Yellow Brick Road Photography

Queen Elizabeth II watches the 151st running of The Queen’s Plate horse race in Toronto, Canada, 04 July 2010. With the passing of the Queen and the accession of Prince Charles to the throne, the race will become The King’s Plate.

This is another view-from-my-office photo.

Most photography web sites are about equipment. I’m referring to photography web sites not photographer web sites. Such photography sites write about gear because it’s quick and easy.

There are some web sites that offer photography advice and instruction. But these “nuts and bolts” sites are superficial and intended for beginners. Quick bites of junk food. Tastes good for the few minutes you’re consuming it.

Continue reading →

css.php