pricing

Reach For The Top

That Sears, Walmart and some grocery stores have portrait studios should be of no concern to commercial photographers. The fact that these stores do family portraits for as little as $7.99 and business portraits for $29.95 is meaningless.

Don’t worry about it.

These cheap photo stores are not your competition, unless you’re trying to do $7.99 children’s portraits and $29.95 business portraits.

Don’t worry that some other photographer charges $35/hour or that they give away all pictures and copyrights for $199. Unless you’re trying to run your business into the ground, this photographer is not your competition.

Your competition is the photographer who charges more than you because they have what you want.

Always compete up not down.

 

Added April 2013: Sears and Walmart portrait studios shut down.

 

Split Decision

Commercial photographers are sometimes asked if two (or more) customers split the cost of the photography licensing fee, can they both use the pictures?

For example, when a photographer is hired by a hotel to produce pictures of some newly decorated rooms, can the interior designer also use the pictures if the designer splits the cost of the photography with the hotel?

The answer is “no”.
Continue reading →

All the toppings

Way back in my teenage years, I worked part-time at a take-out pizza store. Customers would sometimes say, “Give me a large pizza with everything on it.”

When I’d reply, “Okay, that’ll be $26.00” (or whatever the price was), the customer would gasp and quickly change to, “Just make it pepperoni and mushrooms.”

Wants and needs can be quite different when a price tag is attached.

What do you need?

A corporate photography customer recently asked for some photos of their Toronto office. The pictures were to be used on their web site and printed in a brochure. The company sent a list describing the ten pictures they wanted.

I sent a quote for about $2,800.

The customer e-mailed back and was quite shocked at the price. Why is it so expensive?
Continue reading →

Business Balance

Before a company tries to save a few dollars on its corporate photography by buying cheap stock pictures or by hiring the lowest-priced commercial photographer, that business should remember this:

There is hardly anything in the world that someone cannot make a little worse and sell a little more cheaply. The people who consider price alone are that person’s lawful prey.

It is unwise to pay too much but it is worse to pay too little. When you pay too much, you lose a little money, that is all. When you pay too little, you sometimes lose everything because the thing you bought was incapable of doing the thing it was bought to do.

The common law of business balance prohibits paying a little and getting a lot. It cannot be done. If you deal with the lowest bidder, it is well to add something for the risk you run. And if you do that, you will have enough to pay for something better.

– often attributed to 19th-century social critic John Ruskin, an advocate for economic reform and social change.

 

Usage and Licensing Fees

The fee for commercial photography is based on two things: production value (creative fee) and usage (licensing fee). Any production expenses are in addition to this.

One point of the previous post was to show how production value affects the creative fee. High-end camera gear, lots of lighting equipment, and lots of time spent creating a picture, will usually result in a more expensive photo.

The second factor determining the overall fee is photo usage. This usage is a combination of four things: how many pictures will be used, how the photos will be used (media), where the images will be used (location) and when the pictures will be used (time).
Continue reading →

Sticker Shock

Hotel Client: What?! You want $1,500 just for some pictures of our chef?!

Photographer: What do you think the job is worth?

Client: Maybe $250.

Photographer: Okay, for $250, I’ll come by your hotel sometime in the next couple of weeks whenever I have some spare time. When I’m there, hand me your cell phone and I’ll take a few pictures with it. You pay me $250 and the job is done. How does that sound?

Continue reading →

Commercial Photography For Web Sites

When licensing pictures, commercial photographers must remember that there’s no such thing as “web use.” The Web is a medium, not a use. Photos used online can be editorial, advertising or anything in-between.

Many business clients use photos not only on their web site but also on social media such as Facebook and Twitter. A photographer has to decide whether such use is no longer editorial or public relations but rather a form of advertising. The common definition that only a “paid placement” is advertising may no longer apply.

For a corporate client, its own web site is usually considered marketing collateral and not advertising. All advertising is marketing but not all marketing is advertising.

But for a client such as a retailer, is its web site a form of advertising? What about that company’s Facebook or Twitter account?

Perhaps every use on the Web should be priced higher than similar use in print. This is not just for the larger and longer-lasting “circulation” of a web site but also for the increased shift towards advertising use.

 

css.php