Why spend $0 on ad photography when you’re spending tens of thousands of dollars for a full-page newspaper ad?
Why would a national company use an amateur cellphone snapshot when its brand image at stake?
The Globe and Mail today published an ad supplement about franchising. The online version isn’t quite the same as the print version but it does have many of the same photos. The back cover of the print version has a full-page ad for a large pet care company. The amateur point-and-shoot photo missed the purpose of the business. It also missed everything needed in good photography.
Continue reading →