Most studio photographers today use electronic flashes, all sorts of light modifiers and accessories, and a flash meter or exposure meter. But back in the 1800s to early 1900s, photographers did very nice portraits without any of those things. Just window light and a knowledge of how to expose their photographic plates.
There’s no excuse for bad studio lighting today because we have total control of the lighting and we have instant reviews on the back of a digital camera. But I wonder how many of us could work under the same conditions as 125 years ago.
New photographers today could learn a lot by beginning their portrait photography career as if it were 125 years ago. Start with just window light and a reflector. But not at night. :-)
Once you learn window light, and it’s more difficult than you might think, it becomes easy to emulate it with electronic strobes, big or small. Electronic flash has many advantages over window light: flash is more controllable, repeatable, has huge output and it works at night. But window light is free and easy to carry.
Photo studios in the 1800s through the 1920s were usually purpose-built to include large windows and even larger skylights. Window light was the only option back then.
Many of today’s photo studios are windowless because they’re located in commercial or industrial settings that were never designed for photography. Some studios may have windows but they’re not often used for lighting. Thanks to electronic flash, window light is not required.
There are many publicly accessible photo archives which have studio portraits from the mid-1800s and early 1900s. The sharpness, resolution, and dynamic range of these old portraits don’t compare to today’s photography. But the use of light and the control of that light are still something you can learn from today.
[A short rant about Library and Archives Canada: The archives are very valuable but the photos available through its website are low resolution, highly compressed image files. Higher resolution and better quality versions do exist but, for some reason, they’re not online. The site’s search function isn’t very good and images aren’t properly or consistently tagged or captioned. Plus, the search results limit how many pages of images you can view. By contrast, the US Library of Congress usually makes high resolution images easily downloadable and there are no viewing limitations.]
Here are a few more window-lit portraits by Canadian photographer William Topley, all from Library and Archives Canada:
Loved it, many thanks for sharing!