A well-known saying from an unknown source:
“We lose money on every sale but we make up for it with volume!”
There are several web sites which sell discount vouchers to groups of online shoppers. A business will publish a discount offer on such a site and as long as a certain minimum number of folks buy it, the discount vouchers are e-mailed to the buyers. If there aren’t enough buyers, the discount is cancelled and no one’s credit card is charged.
This volume discount voucher system can work well for a company that sells “widgets”, meaning anything where the marginal cost is very low. It can also be good for a business such as a sports, theatrical or other event that needs to unload unsold tickets. Unloading leftover or end-or-line product at a discount can help reduce a loss.
But…
Here are screen grabs of two photography businesses in Toronto, (and I use the term “business” very loosely), which were each recently selling discount vouchers for a portrait session PLUS retouched print(s) PLUS some retouched digital images (PLUS, in one case, all images on a disc for future printing), for $49.00 and $50.00 respectively.
Those prices included the 13% sales tax, local travel expenses and the commission the photographers have to pay to the discount web site.
(I’ve blacked-out the names and web addresses and also blurred the people in the sample photos so as to not embarrass them).
One of these photographers actually promotes themselves on their own site as doing “Cheap Photography”. I guess there’s something to be said for honesty in advertising.
“We give you your money’s worth and not a penny more.” – unknown
If you can read the above screen captures, one photographer sold 650 photo session vouchers for $50 each (including taxes), and these discount vouchers must be used within one year. Feel free to do the math.
Let’s say this photographer manages to do the 650 shoots in one year:
Gross: $32,500
Subtract sales tax: – $3,739
Subtract car expense: – $7,768 (CAA numbers for subcompact car, per year)
Subtract camera gear, lights, computer, software: – $1,500 (assume cheap, minimal gear and a four-year life cycle)
Subtract liability and business insurance: – $350(?) (bottom-end insurance for one year).
Sub-total so far: $19,143
Now continue to subtract: the commission paid to the discount web site (I have no idea what this might be. **Edit: apparently, it’s 30% to 50% off the top. See comment below**), studio lease cost (this photographer said they have a studio), tenant insurance, repair costs, cell phone cost, Internet cost, and who-knows what else.
Even with conservative guesses, we’re now certainly well below $10,000.
For comparison, the minimum wage in Ontario is $10.25/hour. This works out to $21,300 per year (that’s $10.25/hr for 40 hrs/week). So this photographer will earn less than half of the minimum wage.
So this begs the question: Why?
Is there a market for cheap photography? Absolutely. But why would any photo business want to be the bottom-end? Perhaps the photographers are just learning and are using their customers for practice? Perhaps they’re “weekend warriors” with a day job?
These online discount vouchers are great for a business that sells assembly-line products such as bottles of shampoo, cans of soup, or any product that has a low marginal cost. In some cases, boosting sales volume by selling some product at discount prices might even lower the cost of the regularly-priced items (i.e. higher manufacturing volume => lower marginal cost).
But for a photographer who essentially sells time and creativity to individual consumers, increasing sales volume does not decrease the marginal cost of providing that service. No matter how many customers they have, it takes four hours to do four hours of work.
To earn more, a volume-discounting photographer has no choice but to work more. Discounting the price guarantees working more for less money. The more they work, the more they lose.
A high volume – low price photography business is not scalable. Barring a sudden change in business practices, such a business has nowhere to go but down. On the other hand, a low volume – high price photographer and a medium volume – medium price photographer both have room to move and adjust.
Customers who pay more often expect more. But customers who pay less never expect less. Providing customer service to a low-paying client requires the same time and effort as for a higher-paying client.
The easiest way to attract better-paying customers is to raise your prices. Or to rephrase it, lowering your prices will attract more low-paying customers. What business ever says, “If only we had more low-paying customers!”
Turning up the volume has nothing to do with increasing profits. Sales volume and profit per sale are unrelated.
To increase profits, raise prices and value, and turn down the volume.
Great post! I saw these same ads and thought how silly these “photographers” must be.
The kicker is that the revenue split is 50/50 for the website/”photographer”!!
And you didn’t even address the issue of capacity. How long is it going to take them to deal with 650 customers?
They will “travel anywhere in the GTA”
So, let’s assume 30 minutes travel each way, 15 minutes on the phone or e-mail coordinating the details of the 75 minute shoot, copying, editing and printing the images; 30 minutes for even the most minimal amount of effort. You’re already at 3 hours per shoot.
3hrs x 650 = 1,950 hours
Let’s assume the “photographer” gets 50% of the sale and earned $16,250
$16,250 divided by 1,950 hours = $8.33/hour
I am certainly not envious of their 650 customers.
Check out this article as well… re: Groupon (soon to be owned by Google and originator of the concept upon which WagJag is based)
www.photoaspects.com/group…phers.html
The link you provided has some good info for any photographer, or “fauxtographer” :-) , who might be thinking of doing a volume discount offer.
I think any photographer could make more money in the long run by taking a business course and/or buying a book on how to run a (small) business. It’s not always about working harder (e.g. shooting more volume) but rather, shooting smarter.
Very good analyze work!
When it comes to check out the numbers behind all of those group sales things, we see it’s not a good idea for any business to do offers with this. For sure, volume sales related offer is the key for making an offer on Groupon or any copycat site.
On the other hand, the photographers of this offer are going to have a lot of work all year long at a very low wage. But they will get known and after they will be able to raise their prices because of their skills improvement.
I hope for them they evolve, because it can’t be like this forever. They will soon have problems fullfilling their volume of work.
But they will have been known at first as the “cheap photographers”. I don’t know if it’s worth it.
As long as they handle it and like their lives and have other jobs in the beginning or very low expenses ;)